What Do Companies Look For During Background Checks On Checkr

Uber and Lyft background checks by Chekr Checkr is a background check company located in San Francisco, CA. Employers hire Checkr to handle pre-employment screening and background checks.
Checkr provides background bank check services for manufacturing, healthcare, non-profit, retail and hospitality, and education industries.

Notable Companies that take used Checkr for employment groundwork checks

Uber
Lyft
Postmates
Grubhub

The screening services that Checkr offers include:

Social Security Number validation
criminal records check, including terrorist watchlists and sex offender registries
driving records check
employment and educational activity verifications
drug screening
credit checks

Errors, similar incorrect criminal history, on Checkr background checks are common complaints. Nosotros have helped many chore seekers that were denied employment due to groundwork check errors. You are not lone.
Look at the Checkr complaints and Checkr reviews at bbb.org and you will see many others like you lot.
Incorrect criminal history on Checkr groundwork checks can foreclose people from driving for Uber and Lyft.

incorrect criminal history
outdated data
mixed files

Old information tin show up on a background check when databases are not up-to-engagement.

Non-convictions over seven years old should Non exist in your Checkr background check. In California, Kentucky, New York and New Mexico non-convictions CANNOT be on your Checkr background cheque at all. Incorrect criminal history on a groundwork cheque tin happen. It may be as simple every bit having the same proper name or similar address as someone that does have a criminal history. Maybe, y'all had your record expunged and onetime data is on your background check.

It is the responsibility of whatever consumer reporting bureau to make sure the information they provide is accurate and up-to-date.

Unfortunately, mistakes on background checks are common. This can be devastating. Luckily, there are laws in place to protect y'all. The Fair Credit Reporting Human activity (FCRA) protects yous from mistakes on credit reports and background checks.

When a background check is being used against yous the post-obit must happen:
- you must be notified that the report is beingness used against you
- y'all must be given a copy of the report and the contact information of the background check company
- you must be given a summary of your rights.
You have the right to dispute errors on your Checkr background cheque
You have the right to sue Checkr for amercement over your background check

The post-obit are summaries of recent Checkr complaints and cases filed by the consumer police force firm of Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C..
If any of the following situations have happened to you, call ane-877-735-8600 for a free case evaluation.

Customer applied for employment with Shipt in March 2021. Shipt requested a background cheque from Checkr. In response, Checkr produced an inaccurate background bank check report. The inaccurate data was a felony accuse which was plead to a misdemeanor and the Judgment of a misdemeanor was entered past the Court. Checkr was inaccurately reporting the example as a felony conviction. Equally a issue, Client was denied for employment.

Erica Johnson v. Checkr, Inc. – Claimant practical for a delivery task with a nationwide delivery service. The employer ran a groundwork bank check on the Claimant through Checkr, Inc., and the background report created by Checkr, Inc. inaccurately included a misdemeanor battery confidence that really belonged to another person with a similar name. As a upshot of the inaccurate report, Claimant was notified that she was going to be denied the job with the delivery service. In an effort to forbid losing the job offer, Claimant disputed the inaccuracy in the report with Checkr, Inc. Despite the relevant public records making clear that the criminal tape did non belong to Claimant, Checkr, Inc. verified the inaccurate criminal record equally belonging to Claimant, and the task offering was rescinded.

Marcovitch v. Checkr. – Plaintiff was deactivated from Uber considering of an inaccurate background check report by Checkr, in which Checkr mixed the Plaintiff with some other person. The inaccurate information is two open warrants and personal data that belong to another person. Plaintiff disputed and report corrected.

Conley 5. Checkr, Inc. – Claimant applied for a job with Uber. Uber runs background checks on its new hires, and they purchased a groundwork report about Claimant from Checkr. Checkr sold Uber a background written report that inaccurately stated Claimant was a convicted felon. She is non a felon. As a issue of the inaccurate report, Claimant was unable to work as a driver for Uber.

Watson five. Checkr, Inc. – Claimant was a long term driver for Lyft. Lyft runs periodic background reports on its drivers, and it purchases those reports from Checkr. Checkr produced and sold a report to Lyft that incorrectly states that Claimant is a convicted felon. Due to Checkr'due south faulty procedures, Checkr mixed the Claimant with a lifetime gang member who was serving a decades-long prison sentence. As a result of Checkr'due south error, Claimant was suspended from his employment with Lyft.

Marcovitch b. Checkr, Inc. – Plaintiff, Mr. Marcovitch was deactivated from employment with Uber due to inaccurate background study issued by Checkr. The inaccurate data were two open warrants (for murder and attack) that did not belong to him but belonged to another consumer. Due to Checkr's faulty procedures it mixed the Plaintiff with another consumer. The non matching information was a name. Equally a result Plaintiff was deactivated. Plaintiff disputed and report somewhen corrected.

Hodge 5. Checkr, Inc. – Our client, Ms. Hodge was deactivated from Lyft due to Checkr producing an inaccurate background bank check report. The inaccurate information were criminal convictions from 2011 which should non have been reporting because they antedated the report by more than seven years; in violation of the FCRA and California state laws. Ms. Hodge disputed the inaccurate information and Checkr failed to correct it, to date.

Client from CA; bringing claim against background reporting agency Checkr for reporting obsolete information in violation of the FCRA and CA state law. The inaccurate data is criminal records that antedate the groundwork bank check report by more than 7 years. As a effect she lost a job with Uber.

Shannon Nicole Wilson v. Checkr. Plantiff Shannon Nicole Wilson applied for piece of work with Amazon Flex as a commuter. Checkr prepared a background report that contained a felony confidence. The felony conviction on the checkr background bank check was inaccurate. The felony confidence on the checkr report was related to some other person who had the same name equally Plantiff.

Maurice Allan Davis five. Checkr Inc. – Mr. Davis was denied a task equally a as a cell tower technician due to a multiple convictions for possession of marijuana which was inaccurately reported on his background report by Checkr. The criminal records belong to some other individual with a similar name and date of nascence as Mr. Davis.

Ronald Dickerson v. Checkr Inc. –. Mr. Dickerson was denied a chore at SPIN due to an inaccurate felony conviction and two misdemeanor convictions reporting on his Checkr report. The convictions belong to someone who used Mr. Dickerson'southward name as an alias.

Jerome Miller v. Checkr. – NDCA. Mr. Miller was denied employment with Uber because Checkr inaccurately reported his license as beingness expired when it was non, on his Checkr background report. The example settled.

Johnny Immature v. Checkr. – NDCA. Mr. Immature was denied employment with Uber due to criminal records that were inaccurately reported on his groundwork report by Checkr. The inaccurate criminal records were a felony confidence that belonged to another private with a unlike name than Mr. Immature. Mr. Young disputed the inaccurate information and Checkr failed to right it. The instance settled.

Tyrone Gaskin Sr. v. Checkr. – NDCA. Mr. Gaskin was denied employment with Uber due to criminal records that were inaccurately reported on his groundwork study by Checkr. The inaccurate criminal records included 2 felony convictions that belonged to some other individual with the aforementioned name only different date or birth equally Mr. Young. The case settled.

The consumer protection lawyers at Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C. are here for you.

Get the background check errors fixed, and get you any compensation that you may be entitled.

Phone call us right now at ane-877-735-8600 to go help right abroad. Or fill out the case review form on this folio and a representative from our team volition exist in touch.

The help is complimentary and in that location is no out-of-pocket cost to yous. We merely get paid when you win your case.

How to Contact Checkr – Address and Phone Number

Accost: 1 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
Urban center: San Francisco
Country: California
Nada Lawmaking: 94104
Phone: 844-224-3257
Website: Checkr.com